http://www.civiltonguesaustralia.com/2009/08/24/drunken-hooligans/ A civil discussion of policing, libertarian thought, civil liberties and the media Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:07:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.civiltonguesaustralia.com/2009/08/24/drunken-hooligans/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Tony Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:37:49 +0000 http://www.civiltonguesaustralia.com/?p=14#comment-7 Banning drunken thugs from an area will just make them be drunken thugs somewhere else. Banning someone for 24 hours could be problematic, as you pointed out, and would just lead to either cluttered courts with people appealing orders or convoluted laws with caveats like " not to attend .... whilst under the influence...etc" - impossible for police to enforce. Banning drunken thugs from an area will just make them be drunken thugs somewhere else.
Banning someone for 24 hours could be problematic, as you pointed out, and would just lead to either cluttered courts with people appealing orders or convoluted laws with caveats like ” not to attend …. whilst under the influence…etc” – impossible for police to enforce.

]]> http://www.civiltonguesaustralia.com/2009/08/24/drunken-hooligans/comment-page-1/#comment-3 InnerCityTrendy Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:20:33 +0000 http://www.civiltonguesaustralia.com/?p=14#comment-3 Nice post! Yeah - the answer to everything seems to be "more police powers". What's the bet that these powers, along with all the others, will be used predominantly against non-white people. Nice post! Yeah – the answer to everything seems to be “more police powers”. What’s the bet that these powers, along with all the others, will be used predominantly against non-white people.

]]>